Biloxi Fisherman: “I’m sick today and nobody wants to take care of me…”


As expected, the president’s National Oil Spill Commission final report was the political equivalent of a police officer saying “move on, nothing to see here.” But with hundreds of pages, the commission’s work will become a launch point for many debates – including a stark example of the gap between public health risks and actual human beings.

A dramatic example is being reported by David Hammer at the Times-Picayune. He tells the story of James “Catfish” Miller, a Biloxi fisherman who worked for two months using his boat to cleanup BP’s spill. Taking advantage of a public hearing in New Orleans, Mr. Miller told commissioners that he is sick from the oil exposure and “…nobody wants to take care of me.”

The Times-Picayune says that Miller “…bristled at the commission’s conclusion that BP’s use of dispersants was a ‘trade-off’ between the possible exposure to chemical toxins and the certain need to prevent oil from coming ashore and doing greater ecological damage.”

“You people need to understand: My life’s not a trade-off,” Miller said. And Mr. Hammer says the comment came with anger, which isn’t hard to imagine.

One commissioner, according to the TP report, said that health concerns are “clearly a dominant issue down here,” and then promised to share the “really, really powerful” stories of despair with President Obama and his cabinet. But another commissioner warned that the investigative panel was limited in its assessment of the spill’s health impacts by a lack of empirical evidence.

That’s a major point. We begin with a commission lacking subpoena power, so they can only hear from people who want to talk. Then you stress “empirical” evidence in an environment where NOAA and the Coast Guard are the primary custodians of such evidence. Time and again, we’ve seen independent, non-governmental scientists first challenge, then disprove the “official” line.

So, yes, health concerns are a “dominant issue down here,” and sick residents seriously resent being a “trade off”…because they understand that the trade goes beyond the immediate BP spill – now it’s extending deep into the post-spill response.

The Times-Picayune story is here:

© Smith Stag, LLC 2010 – All Rights Reserved

1 comment

  • We were visited by agents from NOAA and the Dept. of Fish & Wildlife back in October. They were investigating the use of corexit on inland waters. I asked them why they couldn’t get records of sales from Nalco and find out how much BP had purchased from them. They said it was too early in the investigation for that. I showed them “some” of the pictures I have taken since we were involved in the VOO program and they wanted copies. After our experience with the Coast Guard, I didn’t give them anything…… They were nice guys and seemed sincere. But a couple days later, I called them to tell them where they could get some fresh samples of a recently sprayed area. They never called me back…….

Stuart H. Smith is an attorney based in New Orleans fighting major oil companies and other polluters.
Cooper Law Firm

Follow Us

© Stuart H Smith, LLC
Share This